Starbucks and "Free" WiFi: They STILL Don't Get It
Okay, I consider myself fairly savvy when it comes to technology. I’ve been using computers in one form or another since 1982. I have a great appreciation for technology that is user friendly, and little patience for technology which is not. I mean, as of this year, we’re now thirty years into the personal computer revolution. Something like connecting to wi-fi internet in a coffee shop shouldn’t be that difficult, right?
Kathy was meeting some teacher friends she used to work with in Louisville tonight, and she asked me if I wanted to tag along. I asked where she was going, and she said “Starbucks.” I groaned. Why not Java Brewing Company? Why not Heine Brothers? Why not Panera? These other coffee shops have no-hassle, easy to access wi-fi. My last experience at Starbucks, described in the link at the top of this post just didn’t turn out that well. Don’t get me wrong--I like Starbucks coffee better than these other places. But because Starbucks’ wi-fi is such a pain, I’ve relegated Starbucks to drive throughs-only over the past couple of years. When I want to hang out in a coffee shop, I go to one of the other places for easy internet access.
So tonight I went with Kathy anyway, figuring I could give the Starbucks one more shot. I needed to grade some papers, and I email out progress reports when I’m through. Granted, I could send the emails out when I got home; maybe I’m just addicted to the internet and feel a need to always be connected.
The first thing I did was ask the barista behind the counter how I would go about getting on the internet. I just played dumb so I could get full information about logging on--in case I had missed something the first time around. No, I had everything right after all. However, I couldn’t find my registered Starbucks card. Perhaps in the nonsense that transpired in July, I had left it in the Starbucks in Louisiana where I unsuccessfully tried to log on.
So, I purchased a new card with the minimum $5 balance to get “free” internet, and went to a table. The barista had told me that if I had trouble getting online, I could call the 800 number on the back of the card. My MacBook immediately connected to the Starbuck’s wi-fi and upon launching Safari, I got this screen:
[click image for larger view]
Now, look at that screen and tell me from the perspective of a Starbucks customer, what I’m supposed to do next. There wasn’t even mention of Starbucks on the screen. So I dialed the 800 number on the back of my card. The automated service went through about half a dozen options, none of which were related to in-store wi-fi, so I pressed nothing and was put into the queue. A message informed me that hold times were unusually long.
After an incredibly long wait, a very nice person named Brianna answered the phone. I told her my situation, and she instructed me to type http://www.starbucks.com into the URL line of my browser so that I could register my card.
What?!
Look carefully at the screenshot above. Was there any indication that I could go to starbucks.com? Was there a link anywhere that even mentioned Starbucks? No, there wasn’t. And attempts to go to any other website were blocked.
After getting to the Starbucks site, the steps for registering my card and signing up for “wi-fi rewards” were pretty straight forward. In fact, I told Brianna that I could probably handle it from thereon. However, I suggested to her that all of this would have been much simpler if there had been some kind of link or information on the AT&T screen indicating that I should go to starbucks.com to register my card. She simply said, “Yes, that is a problem we’re aware of.”
So I hung up with Brianna, completed the registration of my card, which took me back to the AT&T login screen. I entered my user name and password but I still couldn’t connect to the internet. I regretted letting Brianna go so quickly.
At this point, I simply felt I needed to grade my papers. “Forget it,” I told myself, picking up my iPhone to check my email. The iPhone had automatically connected to the store’s wi-fi which I knew would be a bust for the same reason I couldn’t log on with my MacBook. So I disconnected my iPhone from wi-fi and hit the internet through the Edge network. In my inbox came this email:
Here was the reason I had been unable to connect to the internet: I had to click on an emailed link to complete my registration. Had my iPhone, which is email capable, not been with me, I could not have completed this step until I returned home. So I clicked the link which led to this screen on the iPhone’s Safari browser:
I tried logging into AT&T on my MacBook again, and finally I achieved success:
But can you see how inane this entire process is? The process to connect to the internet cannot be finalized in-store unless the user can receive an email to validate registration. However, the user cannot receive the email because the registration has not been validated. This is one of the stupidest processes I’ve ever seen! Who designed this system? Had I not been able to access my email by another device, I would have never been able to connect until my next visit to Starbucks.
How long did this process take from the moment I came in to the point I connected? Forty minutes.
After connecting finally, I looked up and saw Kathy saying goodbye to her friends. She was ready to leave.
So maybe next time, but maybe not. I realize that I won’t have trouble connecting the next time I’m in a Starbucks, but I’m highly offended at how unfriendly the entire system is. And the company wonders why it is suffering financially lately?
One more thing: for the record, Starbucks wi-fi is not really free (or “on the house” as they like to call it). It’s impossible to access the internet unless the user purchases a Starbucks gift card and keeps a $5 minimum and uses the card within a set period. So not only do I have to pay up front, I have to continue paying at certain intervals if I am going to use their “on the house” internet.
But really... if I have to purchase something to get something, then, I’m sorry, but it’s not “on the house.”