Quantum of Solace

Since the newest James Bond flick, Quantum of Solace is still fairly new, I’ll try to keep this as spoiler free as possible.

The weekend numbers are in. Quantum of Solace earned over $70 million dollars its opening weekend, a record best for the franchise, even adjusted for inflation. I hope you like the “new” Bond because with this kind of revenue, there will be no other “course corrections” for quite some time. Daniel Craig is under contract for at least two more films.

For my full thoughts on Craig as Bond, see my review of Casino Royale. However, it goes without saying that even with a second movie under his belt, how well Craig fits the role is still a hot topic of conversation and debate. And it’s not so much that Craig is new in the role or even that he’s blond. Rather, the debate continues because of how much the Bond character himself has had a complete makeover.

As I mentioned in my previous review, the old saying about Bond that “Every woman wants him; every man wants to be him” no longer applies--at least not the last part. I would not want to be this Bond. It would be too painful physically and emotionally. But it’s interesting now how many women are interested in Bond than ever before. This is especially true for those women who in the past, simply saw Bond as a “man’s” movie series. This is a Bond who is more vulnerable and can even be pitied. And yet this is also a more dangerous Bond. In one brief conversation about the movie I had yesterday, a friend of mine described Craig’s Bond perfectly in one word: tortured.

As Kathy and I were driving to the movie on Friday, we heard a less than positive review of the movie on the radio. The reviewer pointed out that in the new movie there are no fancy sports cars and the only love interest came in the previous movie. This is partially untrue. Bond does, in fact, drive the characteristic Aston-Martin at the beginning of Quantum, but to copy a title from an earlier Bond film, it gets the living daylights knocked out of it. When Bond arrives back to his MI6 hideout, the Aston Martin is missing a door and is scratched and dented enough to simply have the whole thing totaled. That car, especially the treatment given to it at the beginning of the movie is a good analogy of what’s been done with the James Bond character. He’s being completely deconstructed. No longer will he fight bad guys without getting his tuxedo dirtied. Now it gets dirty, torn, and bloodied--and so does the character himself.

Many will claim that this Bond is much closer to Fleming’s original vision. Maybe, but not quite. I’ve read most of the Fleming books as well as those of his successor, John Gardner. I can tell you that this Bond is probably closer to Fleming’s vision, but he goes even further. He’s much darker than Fleming imagined. Fleming’s Bond still liked his martinis “shaken, not stirred.” The new Bond, as you might remember from Casino Royale doesn’t “give a damn.”

All of this might leave you with the impression that I didn’t like the movie or that I don’t like the new Bond. Not so. But I admit that I think of this Bond differently. Almost as if he’s a separate character, and this is a separate series. In some ways, it really is. And at times I still miss the old Bond, and I will continue to wish that Brosnan could have made one final movie before the reboot. But enough about that.

Quantum of Solace picks up immediately where the previous movie left off, and I mean immediately. I had watched Casino Royale again a few months back, but it wasn’t recent enough. Ideally the best way to view Quantum of Solace is by watching the previous movie at home and then driving immediately to the theater.

Quantum has been billed as “Bond out for revenge,” but that’s too simplistic. Yes, Bond does go a bit rogue in this movie while M, head of British Intelligence is trying to reign him in, but the real question is whether Bond is motivated more by revenge or more by duty. The answer to that question becomes a bit more clear by the end of the movie.

Bond is certainly the most driven he’s ever been and downright angry in this movie. But that doesn’t mean that he’s dispassionate or even apathetic as demonstrated in a very touching scene in which he holds a dying character in his arms at a pivotal point in the movie. Also, Bond’s maturing relationship with M is very interesting. In the original movies, the Bond character always seemed like a bit of a nuisance to his boss, and the two certainly didn’t seem to have too much respect for each other. Not true of the new series. There is a growing sense of respect between M and Bond, and more importantly, trust.

As already mentioned, although there are a couple of “Bond girls” in this movie, the real love interest in Quantum is still Vesper from the previous movie and she’s dead. Bond obviously had feelings for her, but feels betrayed by her in this movie and the feeling stings. Although there are a few quips here and there, the traditional Bond humor is gone in this installment, but the action and suspense is heightened.

As for the villain, there not much I can say without giving away crucial plot points. However, I will say that this Bond villain will not go down in history as the most memorable bad guy James Bond has ever faced. But maybe that’s by design. Maybe Bond’s wrestling with his own inner demons is the more crucial conflict of the film.

My hope is that by now Bond has dealt with his anger and angst over the scenarios created in Casino Royale and that now he and we, his audience, can move on. I don’t expect we’ll ever go back to the Roger Moore days of nearly winking at the camera, but a bit of levity would be appreciated. Too much of what we see in Quantum to the complete exclusion of the “fun” of the traditional Bond movies could become tiring after a while.

Unless I’m mistaken, the title “Quantum of Solace,” one of Fleming’s short stories about Bond, has now exhausted all of Fleming’s original works (the movie had nothing to do with the story other than the title itself). I don’t want to give away the ending of the movie, but it seems to me that for the next time around, it might be a perfect time to start introducing John Gardner’s works beginning appropriately with his first title License Renewed.

|

Worthy of Note 01/30/2008

Iyov has posted a review of the new ringbinder wide-margin NRSV New Oxford Annotated Bible.

Says Iyov:

So, with all that extra page space, there is plenty of room for making ample annotations. The paper is significantly thicker than typical Bible paper, so there is much less bleed through from a pen. And, I can add extra paper anytime one wants (in the fashion of Jonathan Edwards' Blank Bible). If I make a mistake, I can always remove the page and replace it with a photocopy from my bound edition of the NOAB. If I want to slip in an entire article, or a copy of a page in original languages -- there is no problem. It seems to me that this is the ultimate in flexibility.


I'm glad to see this finally released, although I doubt I'll personally buy one. Regardless, I've got a number of larger blog projects I'm working on, one of which is an update to last year's survey of wide-margin Bibles. I'm glad that I'll be able to include an entry for the NRSV this year.


J. Mark Betrand has written "A (Bible) Reader's Manifesto." Says Bertrand:

But we find ourselves at a point in history when we've never had so many choices, and yet the options are mostly arrayed along a horizontal spectrum -- a thousand different flavors of the same basic thing. I'd like to see more vertical choices, and that might require a shift in perspective. Instead of speaking to end-users as consumers, we might have to start thinking of them as readers.


What is most significant in the post is Bertrand's five-point "Starting Points for Marketing High-End Bible Editions." I can only hope that publishers will pay attention.

James White announced today that he will face Bart Ehrman in a debate early next year on the subject "Can the New Testament Be Inspired in Light of Textual Variation?" This will no doubt be a debate to watch/hear and then discuss.

My esteem for White dropped significantly a few years ago due to the way he handled a theological disagreement with another individual whom I respect very much. I felt his approach to the issue was uncharitable, far too public, and lacking in the kind of collegiality that should characterize Christian scholarship. Nevertheless, White is usually in natural form when he is engaged in formal debate. However, I often believe that White is rarely pitted in his debates against opponents who are equally skilled. At the very least, Ehrman should provide a worthy opponent to White and this is a subject in which both are well-versed.

Christianity Today has released its list of the "
10 Most Redeeming Films of 2007." Some entries on the list may surprise you, but it's a very good list. I remember when we used to do more movie reviews and discussion around here.

Finally, in the
I JUST DON'T GET IT DEPARTMENT: 2008 marks the 30th anniversary of the New International Version of the Bible. I've seen references on two other blogs (see here and here; oh, and also here) that Zondervan is planning a special wide-margin, high-end leather edition of the NIV Study Bible as one of the many ways that the NIV's 30th anniversary will be celebrated.

This is in spite of the fact that so many of us have asked for one decent wide-margin edition of the TNIV (the so-called TNIV Square Bible is flawed in three areas: (1) it's paper is too thin for annotations because it is a thinline, (2) the user doesn't have wide margin access to the inner column of text, and (3) the binding is subpar). If the TNIV is truly an improvement to the NIV (which I honestly believe it is), then why does Zondervan (and IBS, Cambridge, and Hodder) keep pushing the NIV and publishing new editions? If in ten years the TNIV turns out to be an also-ran translation, it will only be because publishers didn't know how to fully transition away from the NIV.

My suggestion for celebrating the NIV's 30 year anniversary?
Retire it. (My apologies to everyone I just offended, including my friends at Zondervan.)

I would like to find simply ONE decent wide-margin, high quality (see Bertrand's post above for the meaning of high-quality) Bible in a contemporary 21st century translation (HCSB, NLTse, TNIV, or NET). I'm still writing down notes in my wide margin NASB95, but the first translation of those I've listed that is released in a single-column, non-thinline, wide-margin edition, I will make my primary translation for preaching and teaching for the next decade. You heard it here first.

|

Kathy's Right to the Point Movie Reviews

I know I can sometimes write longwinded movie reviews. Not so with Kathy. She can sum up a movie within one to three sentences. See her most recent "Right to the Point Movie Reviews" where she tackles these movies:

The Illusionist
The Prestige
Borat
Norbit
Ghost Rider

And later next week, check back here for my review of 300, which I saw last night.

|