Judge says rape victim can’t use the words “rape” or “victim”
A judge has declared a mistrial in a sex-assault
case where he had barred the words “rape” and “victim,”
among others.
Before a jury was even seated, a judge declared a mistrial in a sex-assault case where he had barred the words “rape” and “victim,” among others.
Cheuvront barred attorneys and witnesses from using words including “rape,” “victim,” “assailant” and “sexual-assault kit,” and ordered witnesses to sign papers saying they wouldn’t use the words. Words such as “sex” and “intercourse” were allowed.
Nebraska state law allows judges to bar words or phrases that could prejudice or mislead a jury.
Bowen, 24, was fighting the ban, arguing that it hurt her testimony because she had to pause and make sure her words wouldn’t violate the ban. She said: “I want the freedom to be able to point [to Safi] in court and say, ‘That man raped me.’ “
Anyone think this judge is the sort who sits up and worries all night about defendent’s rights versus victim’s rights? Or does he think there’s no such thing as date rape?
Posted: Sun - July 15, 2007 at 10:11 AM