Was London The Site Of A Dirty Bomb Trial Run?The ado around the polonium incident in London
has a certain quirk to it which I find annoying. Why is everyone talking about
the victims (real and potential) and piquant details of secondary importance,
when there is something far more important to worry about?
![]() I don’t know anything about
Tatayna Sinitsyna or her commentary for RIA Novosti. I tend not to prejudge
writers because of where they’re publishing; however, this opinion piece
raises a couple of questions which have already occurred to
me.
Nuclear physicist Alexander Borovoi, a professor at the Kurchatov Institute research center, pinpointed my cause of concern: “The worst part of the story is that it was like a rehearsal for a dirty bomb. The incident shows that something dangerous is cooking in the terrorist kitchen, with menacing ideas and plans that can generally be described as a crime.” Experience and history tell me not to have a whole boatload of confidence in the ethics of any nation’s security services. But, the requisites for wacking an individual — Litvinenko or whoever — are as simple as Borovoi said. Why use something so expensive and dangerous? Certainly, the Russian government benefits from pointing blame in another direction. But, what if they’re correct? Posted: Sat - December 16, 2006 at 05:48 AM |