Afghanistan close to anarchy, warns NATO general
The most senior British military commander in
Afghanistan yesterday described the situation in the country as “close to
anarchy” with feuding foreign agencies and unethical private security
companies compounding problems caused by local corruption.
The most senior British military commander in Afghanistan yesterday described the situation in the country as “close to anarchy” with feuding foreign agencies and unethical private security companies compounding problems caused by local corruption.
The stark warning came from Lieutenant General David Richards, head of Nato’s international security force in Afghanistan, who warned that western forces there were short of equipment and were “running out of time” if they were going to meet the expectations of the Afghan people.
The assumption within Nato countries had been that the environment in Afghanistan after the defeat of the Taliban in 2002 would be benign, Gen Richards said. “That is clearly not the case,” he said yesterday.
Sound familiar?
Gen Richards will also take command of the 4,500-strong British brigade in Helmand province at the heart of the hostile, poppy-growing south of the country when it comes under Nato’s overall authority. He said yesterday that Nato “could not afford not to succeed” in its attempt to bring long-term stability to Afghanistan and build up the country’s national army and security forces. He described the mission as a watershed for Nato, taking on “land combat operations for the first time in its history”.
The picture Gen Richards painted yesterday contrasted markedly with optimistic comments by ministers when they agreed earlier this month to send reinforcements to southern Afghanistan at the request of British commanders there. Many of those will be engineers with the task of appealing to Afghan “hearts and minds” by repairing the infrastructure, including irrigation systems.
Gen Richards said yesterday that was a priority. How to eradicate opium poppies - an issue repeatedly highlighted by ministers - was a problem that could only be tackled later.
The “Coalition of the Willing” already reneged on promises to fund sustainable, non-drug agriculture in Afghanistan. Now, politicians on both sides of the pond want to focus on the sort of military campaign that offers up populist sound bites and photo ops. Opium crops destroyed will supposedly equate with Taliban defeats.
Posted: Sun - July 23, 2006 at 07:36 AM